Good design is about to get more expensive and become less available.

And as this article says, this is big (and not so great) news for Aldi and its consumer fans.

The attached article is specifically about a chair designed in 1950 by Charles and Ray Eames and its current replicas. Aldi produce a very similar chair and sell it for £39.99. An authorised version would be worth £339 and it would not be sold via Aldi.

Despite complaints from both sellers of the original and the designers’ grandson, under UK law it is currently lawful for Aldi to sell these chairs. This is due to the existing time limit on the legal protection that grants the creator of industrially produced items such as this chair a monopoly right to prevent others from copying it. That time limit presently endures for only 25 years from when the product was first marketed.

However, this summer, that law is about to change. Once the law changes, it will almost certainly not be lawful to sell copies of these chairs or other artistic designs unless the far longer time period has passed: the life of the creator plus 70 years, which the same time limit as for individually produced artworks. So from 28 July 2016, industrially produced ‘artistic works’, such as the DSW Eames chair, will gain the same protection under UK law as other works of art. (If a retailer is already in possession of copies, it can continue legally to sell them until 28 January 2017.)

It is reasonable to anticipate that there will sometimes be a few grey areas as this new law is rolled out; if an item is only protected as a design as opposed to as an artistic work, the duration of the protection will not be extended. However, for many items it will be very clear that suddenly the law prevents reproduction whereas it did not before.

Is this change in the law a good thing? It’s difficult to say. Tony Ash, managing director of Vitra, which manufactures the original DSW Eames chair, says that the UK’s relatively weak IP protections have made it a laughing stock, as elsewhere in the world stronger IP protection favour creators a lot more. It is certainly well-recognised that strong intellectual property rights attract continued investment in good design, both by creators and those keen and authorised to exploit the created product.

On the other hand, the Antiques Trade Gazette has suggested that museums will be badly affected by the change due to its effect on publications, promotional material and their shops; their exhibits themselves will probably be allowed under the fair use exception.

Intellectual property protection is all about getting the balance correct – make protection too extensive and creators will have an unfair monopoly position which excludes competition, weakens consumer choice and stifles pressure to innovate; but operate a protection regime that is too weak and doesn’t facilitate a fair compensation for a creator’s effort and investment, and such artists will not be motived to create.

In practical terms, any business who operates a retail model or business approach that is similar to Aldi’s should think carefully about the effect of this legal change and act accordingly. That might mean trying to obtain licences where they thought the copyright had expired long ago. Creators who thought their monopoly right had expired should also consider how to exploit their copyrights anew.

And as for the rest of us? Well, I quite like that chair. Maybe I’ll dash off to Aldi now before they run out of stock?

You're on our blog and updates site, which is hosted by elXtr. elXtr is a leading online legal information service owned by us, LHS Solicitors LLP.

Law for the online generation starts here.